CURRENT SRP SETTINGS
Stroke length2.55 m
Pumping speed5.8 SPM
VFD frequency43 Hz
WELL B-12 · BAGHEWALA FIELD · MODEL / DEMO ESTIMATES
SRP AI OPTIMIZER
Balance stroke, pumping speed and VFD frequency against heavy-oil viscosity, fluid level, rod loading and pump fillage.
AI RECOMMENDED SETTINGS
Stroke length2.5 m-2%
Pumping speed5.2 SPM-10.3%
VFD frequency42 Hz-2.3%
Targets lower dynamic loading while holding representative heavy-oil lift performance.
Rod load
92.1 %
Pump fillage
89.5 %
Pump efficiency
80.7 %
Wellbore pressure
27.9 bar
Fluid level
69.4 %
Reservoir temperature
70.8 °C
Crude viscosity
598 cP
Rod floating risk
39.4 %
Impact loading risk
38.5 %
Oil production
43.8 m³/day
ROD IMPACT LOADING RISK
Dynamic load reversal monitor
Modeled load-position evidence for Well B-12. All values are simulation/model estimates.
Peak rod load
105%
AI target 92.4%
Minimum rod load
82.3%
AI target 79.6%
Load fluctuation
22.7%
Peak-to-trough modeled card
Impact severity
CONTROLLED
38.5% live twin risk
Model scenario
HIGH → LOW
78% → 28% estimate
AI recommended SRP: reduce SPM from 5.8 → 4.9, then optimize stroke and VFD toward 2.5 m / 42 Hz. This reduces modeled impact loading by slowing rod reversal while protecting fillage.
PREDICTED OUTCOME AFTER SRP OPTIMIZATION
AI simulation / prototype estimate · model confidence: 89% (not validated field accuracy)
Expected oil production
44 m³/day
+0.2 m³/day
Pump efficiency
85.6%
+4.9 pts
Energy intensity
546 kWh/bbl
-2.5%
Rod floating risk
27.8%
11.6 pts lower
Impact loading risk
28.7%
9.8 pts lower
Rod failure risk
29%
8 pts lower
Pump fillage
95.4%
+5.9 pts
Peak rod load
85.5%
6.6 pts lower
DYNAMOMETER-STYLE LOAD CARD
Current vs AI-optimized modeled polished-rod load.
AI EXPLANATION
Why the model changes SRP speed
Heavy-oil viscosity is 598 cP at 70.8°C. At 5.8 SPM, the modeled fluid level and fillage produce dynamic rod loading that elevates floating and impact risk.
Change: Set 2.5 m stroke, 5.2 SPM and 42 Hz.
Expected effect: Better fillage, lower load reversal and lower energy intensity while maintaining representative production.
Predicted rod-floating risk: 39.4% → 27.8%